You see a lot of words getting thrown
about in the world today and most of them with little care for their
actual meaning. Often groups or individuals will take a word or
phrase that sounds good or has a particular popular understanding and
adopt it for their own purposes. Take the word “fundamental” for
example, you've probably seen it used more as a part of
“fundamentalist” or “fundamentalism” and nearly always in a
negative context. That being said however...
According to Webster: (
fun·da·men·tal ) forming or relating to the most important
part of something; of central importance; serving as a basis
supporting existence or determining essential structure or function.
So
something that is fundamental is something that is based on,
connected to, or is a part of the most basic necessary factors of a
thing. Kind of strange when you see fundamental behavior being
characterized as something weird, illogical, or insane. You most
often see this word used in regards to religion and specifically
religious people. They get labeled as “fundamentalists” and
everyone knows right away that you're talking about crazy people who
live on a ranch somewhere and don't let their daughters date or wear
pants instead of dresses. Thanks to Webster though we can see that
someone who is a fundamental believer in something is really just
someone who holds to what
that system actually teaches.
Ultimately then, it comes down not to whether someone is fundamental
or not but to what those fundamentals are that they believe whether
or not you think them defensible.
Lets
make a quick comparison of Islam and Christianity. Now of course
this a cursory look but the point should still be served. Anyone who
reads the two texts (the Qur'an and the Bible respectively) will or
at least should notice a marked difference in the way each text
treats those who don't believe. Now the Bible doesn't mince words,
there is only one way to heaven and those who do not choose to follow
God will face Hell but it is Islam that calls for the earthly
destruction of non-believers.
From
the Qur'an:
“Kill
disbelievers wherever you find them. If they attack you, then kill
them. Such is the reward of disbelievers. (But if they desist in
their unbelief, then don't kill them.)”
2:191-2
“Fight
them until "religion is for Allah."
2:193
“War
is ordained by Allah, and all Muslims must be willing to fight,
whether they like it or not.”
2:216
And
now, the New Testament of the Bible:
"Go
therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in
the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,”
(Matthew
28:19)
“Repay
no one evil for evil. Have regard for good things in the sight of all
men. If it is possible, as much as depends on you, live peaceably
with all men. Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give
place to wrath; for it is written, "Vengeance is Mine, I will
repay," says the Lord. Therefore "If your enemy is hungry,
feed him; If he is thirsty, give him a drink; For in so doing you
will heap coals of fire on his head." Do not be overcome by
evil, but overcome evil with good.”
(Romans
12:17-21)
"You
have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor and hate
your enemy.' "But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those
who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who
spitefully use you and persecute you,”
(Matthew
5:43-44)
Now
there are all kinds of points that can be made about context and
historical text verses commanding text but again my point holds. To
be a fundamental Christian is to be one who loves their enemies and
wishes harm on no one, to be a fundamental Muslim is to work for the
kingdom of Allah on earth either by conversion or by the sword. No
where in the New Testament are we told to establish a kingdom for God
or to “convert” others by any means. We are teachers, preachers,
and prophets telling the people around us what God has said; they are
responsible for their own souls after that. Those who murder and
steal and cause harm in the name of Christ are in fact, not
following the words of Scripture.
Being
fundamental is not necessarily a bad thing. Its important for
example that a chemist be a fundamental chemist, otherwise they'll be
ignoring some very important laws and they won't be very useful.
Don't let people around you lump “fundamentalists” into one giant
group of crazy people, study the beliefs and ask yourself if their
being fundamental is really the right way to be. I am a fundamental
Christian because I hold to what the Bible actually teaches; not what
people think it says, not what people say about what it says, and
certainly not because everything in there is easy or liked by whoever
reads it. A belief must be judged by what it claims and not
necessarily by what the “followers” actually do, it must be
judged by its fundamentals.
No comments:
Post a Comment